z-logo
Premium
Characterization of 2‐(2‐methoxyethoxy)ethanol‐substituted phosphazene polymers using pervaporation, solubility parameters, and sorption studies
Author(s) -
Orme Christopher J.,
Klaehn John R.,
Harrup Mason K.,
Lash Robert P.,
Stewart Frederick F.
Publication year - 2005
Publication title -
journal of applied polymer science
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.575
H-Index - 166
eISSN - 1097-4628
pISSN - 0021-8995
DOI - 10.1002/app.21898
Subject(s) - solubility , phosphazene , pervaporation , polymer , permeation , chemistry , sorption , membrane , methanol , hildebrand solubility parameter , polymer chemistry , chemical engineering , ethanol , organic chemistry , biochemistry , adsorption , engineering
Two linear phosphazene polymers were synthesized with differing amounts of hydrophilic 2‐(2‐methoxyethoxy)ethanol (MEE) and hydrophobic 4‐methoxyphenol (MEOP) substituted on the backbone. These high polymers were cast into membranes and their permeability to water, methanol, ethanol, and 2‐propanol was evaluated as a function of temperature. An additional polymer with a low content of MEE was studied for water permeation and was characterized by trace flux. At higher levels of MEE on the backbone, fluxes of all solvents increased. Solubility also was found to increase with increasing MEE content for all solvents except water. Unexpectedly, water was found to be less soluble in the higher MEE polymer, although higher membrane fluxes were observed. Diffusion coefficients showed the following trend: methanol ≫ 2‐propanol > ethanol ≫ water. Finally, the affinity of solvents and polymers was discussed in terms of Hansen solubility parameters. © 2005 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 97: 939–945, 2005

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here