z-logo
Premium
Preparation and structural characterization of melamine–methylurea–formaldehyde resin and its blends separately with ethyl cellulose, starch, teakwood, and almond shell powders by 13 C NMR, IR, TGA, and SEM techniques
Author(s) -
Singh Man
Publication year - 2004
Publication title -
journal of applied polymer science
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.575
H-Index - 166
eISSN - 1097-4628
pISSN - 0021-8995
DOI - 10.1002/app.20279
Subject(s) - thermogravimetric analysis , cellulose , materials science , starch , polymer chemistry , melamine resin , curing (chemistry) , ethyl cellulose , formaldehyde , chemical engineering , hemicellulose , melamine , scanning electron microscope , polymer , nuclear chemistry , composite material , organic chemistry , chemistry , engineering , coating
Melamine–methylurea–formaldehyde (MMUF) polymer resin was prepared by condensation polymerization and the molecular weight was determined by viscometry. It was blended with dried starch and ethyl cellulose, and cellulose and hemicellulose‐rich teakwood and lignocellulose‐rich almond shell dried powders separately. The structural characterization of resin with 13 C NMR and IR spectroscopy, and morphological studies on the resin and blends were undertaken with thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) and Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM). The micrographs of the starch and ethyl cellulose have found resemblance with pure resin while teakwood and almond powders have been found to differ in structure from starch and ethyl cellulose due to crack masks in the bulk structure. The different weight loss at different temperatures of the blends was observed, which proves that blending materials do control the weight loss of resin with TGA or curing. © 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 92: 3437–3446, 2004

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here