Premium
Short sisal fiber reinforced styrene‐butadiene rubber composites
Author(s) -
Kumar R. Prasantha,
Amma M. L. Geethakumari,
Thomas Sabu
Publication year - 1995
Publication title -
journal of applied polymer science
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.575
H-Index - 166
eISSN - 1097-4628
pISSN - 0021-8995
DOI - 10.1002/app.1995.070580315
Subject(s) - materials science , composite material , natural rubber , ultimate tensile strength , curing (chemistry) , fiber , scanning electron microscope , vulcanization , styrene butadiene , polymer , styrene , copolymer
Styrene‐butadiene rubber (SBR) composites were prepared by incorporating short sisal fibers of different lengths and concentrations into the SBR matrix in a mixing mill according to a base formulation. The curing characteristics of the mixes were studied and the samples were vulcanized at 150°C. The properties of the vulcanizates such as stress‐strain behavior, tensile strength, modulus, shore‐A hardness, and resilience were studied. Both the cured and uncured properties showed a remarkable anisotropy. It has been found that aspect ratio in the range of 20–60 is effective for sufficient reinforcement. The mechanical properties were found to increase along and across the grain direction with the addition of fibers. The effects of fiber length, orientation, loading, type of bonding agent, and fiber‐matrix interaction on the properties of the composites were evaluated. The extent of fiber orientation was estimated from green strength measurements. The adhesion between the fiber and the rubber was enhanced by the addition of a dry bonding system consisting of resorcinol and hexamethylene tetramine. The bonding agent provided shorter curing time and enhanced mechanical properties. The tensile fracture surfaces of the samples have been examined by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) to analyze the fiber surface morphology, orientation, fiber pull‐out, and fiber‐matrix interfacial adhesion. Finally, anisotropic swelling studies were carried out to analyze the fiber‐matrix interaction and fiber orientation. © 1995 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.