Premium
Semiempirical models for steady‐shear viscosity and prediction of first normal stress function
Author(s) -
Seo Yongsok
Publication year - 1994
Publication title -
journal of applied polymer science
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.575
H-Index - 166
eISSN - 1097-4628
pISSN - 0021-8995
DOI - 10.1002/app.1994.070520506
Subject(s) - quantum entanglement , shear rate , shear stress , stress relaxation , stress (linguistics) , viscosity , shear (geology) , thermodynamics , function (biology) , mechanics , statistical physics , materials science , physics , composite material , quantum mechanics , linguistics , creep , philosophy , evolutionary biology , biology , quantum
In order to describe viscosity function behavior dependent on shear rate in steady‐shear flow and to predict the first normal stress function without using discrete relaxation time specturm, we combined the microscopic entanglement concept based on Graessley's entanglement network theory with the macroscopic constitutive model. The viscosity function derived from the entanglement model has three adjustable parameters and it was assumed to have the form of the inverse contangent function of the shear rate. Then the first normal stress function is obtained using the Wagner's relationship. The model prediction for the first normal stress coefficient is compared with experimental data of polymer melts. Even though viscosity function and the first normal stress function vary over a wide range of shear rate, they were in good agreement for polymer melts at high shear rate. First normal stress function do not show any numerical artifacts. However, discrepancy in the first normal stress function occurs at low shear rate. This is due to the irreversibility of the entangled molecule's motion that was not taken into consideration in the entanglement model. Irreversible nonaffine motion is introduced by adding a term similar to the White‐Metzner model's irreversible factor. Addition of irreversibility in the calculation of the first normal stress function considerably improves the agreement. Other comparisons are also presented and related discussions are given. © 1994 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.