z-logo
Premium
Enhanced laminate damping via modification of viscoelastic interlayer
Author(s) -
Liao FuSen,
Hsu TzuChien J.,
Su A. C.
Publication year - 1993
Publication title -
journal of applied polymer science
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.575
H-Index - 166
eISSN - 1097-4628
pISSN - 0021-8995
DOI - 10.1002/app.1993.070481014
Subject(s) - materials science , composite material , loss factor , viscoelasticity , vulcanization , natural rubber , dissipation factor , maleic anhydride , polypropylene , dynamic mechanical analysis , polymer , damping capacity , vibration , butyl rubber , copolymer , physics , optoelectronics , quantum mechanics , dielectric , alloy
This study sought to develop a sandwich‐type vibration damping laminate suitable for room‐temperature applications. The laminate consisted of a polymeric interlayer that was sandwiched between two steel sheets. The study was initiated to promote the relatively low‐damping capability of a maleic anhydride‐grafted polypropylene (mPP)‐based laminate, which failed to meet the requirement that the loss factor of the laminate should be greater than 0.05 for effective damping. Modifications of mPP by incorporation of a dynamically vulcanized PP/butyl rubber blend were then followed. The modifications were based on the theoretical analysis proposed by Rose, Ungar, and Kerwin (RUK) for a general polymer‐based laminate. The design criteria for the polymeric interlayer, i.e., the preferred range of storage modulus G ′ for a set of reasonable values of loss tangent (tan δ), were first established from calculations by use of the RUK theory. The theoretical calculations revealed that the low damping of the mPP‐based laminate resulted primarily from the high G ′ and low tan δ of the interlayer. Incorporation of butyl rubber into the polymeric interlayer led to a strong decrease in G ′ and a moderate increase in tan δ. These modifications resulted in significantly improved damping capability of the laminate, as predicted by the RUK theory. © 1993 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here