Premium
Rubber‐modified epoxies. II. Influence of the cure schedule and rubber concentration on the generated morphology
Author(s) -
Verchere D.,
Pascault J. P.,
Sautereau H.,
Moschiar S. M.,
Riccardi C. C.,
Williams R. J. J.
Publication year - 1991
Publication title -
journal of applied polymer science
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.575
H-Index - 166
eISSN - 1097-4628
pISSN - 0021-8995
DOI - 10.1002/app.1991.070420315
Subject(s) - differential scanning calorimetry , materials science , natural rubber , composite material , epoxy , scanning electron microscope , volume fraction , acrylonitrile , copolymer , morphology (biology) , particle size , phase (matter) , polymer chemistry , polymer , chemical engineering , chemistry , physics , genetics , organic chemistry , biology , engineering , thermodynamics
The morphology of a system consisting of a bisphenol A diglycidylether (DGEBA) based epoxy, cured with a cycloaliphatic diamine (4,4′‐diamino‐3,3′‐dimethyldicyclohexylmethane, 3DCM), in the presence of an epoxy‐terminated butadience‐acrylonitrile random copolymer (ETBN), was studied as a function of the cure schedule and the initial rubber concentration. Scanning (SEM) and transmission (TEM) electron microscopy, differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) and dynamic mechanical analysis were used to characterize the generated morphology. SEM results were not affected by the type of mechanical test and strain rate. Trends observed for the particle size distribution, the volume fraction of dispersed phase, the concentration of dispersed phase particles and the composition of both phases as a function of polymerization temperature and rubber concentration, were discussed. A correlation between the viscosity at the cloud point and the average size of dispersed phase particles was found for different systems, independently of the cure temperature and the initial rubber amount.