Premium
Morphology of water‐blown flexible polyurethane foams
Author(s) -
Armistead James Paul,
Wilkes Garth L.,
Turner Robert B.
Publication year - 1988
Publication title -
journal of applied polymer science
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.575
H-Index - 166
eISSN - 1097-4628
pISSN - 0021-8995
DOI - 10.1002/app.1988.070350305
Subject(s) - crystallinity , materials science , small angle x ray scattering , polyurea , differential scanning calorimetry , scanning electron microscope , composite material , polyurethane , morphology (biology) , elastomer , paracrystalline , chemical engineering , scattering , crystallography , chemistry , physics , genetics , biology , optics , thermodynamics , engineering
A series of four TDI–polypropylene oxide (PO) water‐blown flexible polyurethane foams was produced in which the water content was varied from 2 to 5 pph at a constant isocyanate index of 110. A portion of each foam was thermally compression molded into a plaque. The morphology of both the foams and plaques was investigated using dynamic mechanical spectroscopy (DMS), differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), transmission electron microscopy (TEM), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), swelling, wide angle X‐ray scattering (WAXS), and small angle X‐ray scattering (SAXS). A high degree of microphase separation occurs in these foams, and its degree is nearly independent of water (hard segment) content. In the foam with the lowest water content the morphology possesses many similarities to that of typical linear segmented urethane elastomers. Small hard segment domains are present with a correlation distance of about 7.0 nm. When the water content is increased a binodal distribution of hard segment material appears. There are the small hard segment domains typical of segmented urethane elastomers as well as larger “hard aggregates” greater than 100 nm in size. The larger domains are thought to be aggregates of rich polyurea that develop by precipitation during the foaming reaction. WAXS patterns of the foams suggest urea and possibly hard segment ordering that may be of a paracrystalline nature but certainly lacking in true 3‐dimensional crystallinity.