Premium
Compatibility studies on blends of poly(ethylene ortho‐phthalate) and poly(vinyl acetate)
Author(s) -
VazquezTorres H.,
CruzRamos C. A.
Publication year - 1986
Publication title -
journal of applied polymer science
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.575
H-Index - 166
eISSN - 1097-4628
pISSN - 0021-8995
DOI - 10.1002/app.1986.070320735
Subject(s) - vinyl acetate , materials science , differential scanning calorimetry , glass transition , polymer chemistry , polymer blend , polymer , miscibility , methyl methacrylate , polyvinyl acetate , chemical engineering , composite material , copolymer , thermodynamics , physics , engineering
Blends of poly(ethylene ortho‐phthalate) (PEOP), and poly(vinyl acetate) (PVAc), appear to be compatible at all compositions, from visual examination at room temperature and differential scanning calorimetry tests. Both low‐ (PEOP‐1) and high‐molecular weight (PEOP‐2) alloys with PVAc show a single composition‐dependent glass transition temperature (Tg). Some blends show Tg values that are below the Tg for either of the pure polymers. Couchman's equation, with a slight modification, can be used to model Tg behavior. All PEOP‐2 blends with PVAc, phase separate at high temperatures, whereas PEOP‐1–PVAc blends remain miscible under the same conditions. The composition dependence of the blends refractive index shows a deviation from simple additivity rules, and a similar trend is observed in density measurements. When comparing Flory's characteristic parameters for the polymers, compatibility is predicted for PVAc–PEOP blends. In contrast, blends of PEOP and poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA), which has a similar chemical structure to that of PVAc are predicted to be incompatible, in agreement with experimental evidence. It is suggested that compatibility is produced because of possible specific interactions between the aromatic group of PEOP and the ester carbonyl on PVAc, which is not sterically hindered as is the corresponding moiety on PMMA.