Premium
Effect of co‐promoter and secondary monomer on shrinkage control of unsaturated polyester (UP)/styrene (St)/low‐profile additive (LPA) systems cured at low temperatures
Author(s) -
Cao Xia,
Lee L. James
Publication year - 2001
Publication title -
journal of applied polymer science
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.575
H-Index - 166
eISSN - 1097-4628
pISSN - 0021-8995
DOI - 10.1002/app.1900
Subject(s) - shrinkage , curing (chemistry) , divinylbenzene , materials science , polymerization , styrene , monomer , polymer chemistry , composite material , kinetics , bifunctional , chemical engineering , polymer , chemistry , copolymer , organic chemistry , catalysis , physics , quantum mechanics , engineering
The shrinkage of unsaturated polyester (UP)/styrene (St) resins cured at low temperatures can be reduced by the presence of low‐profile additives (LPAs). It is believed that the reaction‐induced phase separation and the polymerization shrinkage in both the LPA‐rich and UP‐rich phases result in the formation of microvoids, which partially compensates the resin shrinkage. The relative reaction rate in the two phases plays an important role in shrinkage control. In this study, secondary monomers [such as divinylbenzene (DVB) and trimethylopropane trimethacrylate (TMPTMA)] and a co‐promoter, 2,4‐pentandione (2,4‐P), were added into the UP/St/LPA resin systems to investigate their effect on the shrinkage control of resins cured at low temperatures. Dilatometery results showed that the addition of both TMPTMA and 2,4‐P resulted in an earlier volume expansion during curing and better shrinkage control. The phase separation, reaction kinetics, and viscosity changes in the LPA‐rich and UP‐rich phases during curing were also investigated. The results confirmed that the increased reaction rate in the LPA‐rich phase led to an earlier formation of microvoids and, consequently, less volume shrinkage of the cured resin. © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 82: 738–749, 2001