z-logo
Premium
Blends of aliphatic polyesters. IV. Morphology, swelling behavior, and surface and bulk properties of blends from hydrophobic poly( L ‐lactide) and hydrophilic poly(vinyl alcohol)
Author(s) -
Tsuji Hideto,
Muramatsu Hiroki
Publication year - 2001
Publication title -
journal of applied polymer science
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.575
H-Index - 166
eISSN - 1097-4628
pISSN - 0021-8995
DOI - 10.1002/app.1651
Subject(s) - materials science , vinyl alcohol , ultimate tensile strength , differential scanning calorimetry , composite material , swelling , scanning electron microscope , polymer blend , contact angle , morphology (biology) , absorption of water , polyester , polymer chemistry , polymer , copolymer , physics , genetics , biology , thermodynamics
Blend films were prepared from hydrophobic poly( L ‐lactide) (PLLA) and hydrophilic poly(vinyl alcohol) (PVA) with different PLLA contents [ X PLLA (w/w) = PLLA/(PVA + PLLA)] by solution casting and melt quenching. Their morphology, swelling behavior, and surface and bulk properties were investigated. Polarizing optical microscopy, scanning electron microscopy, differential scanning calorimetry, X‐ray diffractometry, and tensile testing revealed that PLLA and PVA were phase separated in these blend films and the PLLA‐rich and PVA‐rich phases both formed a continuous domain in the blend film of X PLLA = 0.5. The water absorption of the blend films was higher for the blend films of low X PLLA values when compared at the same immersion time, and it was larger than expected from those of nonblended PLLA and PVA films. The dynamic contact angles of the blend films were linearly increased with an increase in X PLLA . The tensile strength and Young's modulus of the dry blend films decreased with a rise in X PLLA , but this dependence was reversed because of the large decreases in tensile strength and Young's modulus for the blend films having high X PLLA values after immersion in water. The elongation at break was higher for the wet blend film than for the dry blend film when compared at the same X PLLA and that of the dry and wet blend films decreased with an increase in X PLLA . © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 81: 2151–2160, 2001

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here