z-logo
Premium
Reaction kinetics for solid‐state polymerization of poly(ethylene terephthalate)
Author(s) -
Duh Ben
Publication year - 2001
Publication title -
journal of applied polymer science
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.575
H-Index - 166
eISSN - 1097-4628
pISSN - 0021-8995
DOI - 10.1002/app.1607
Subject(s) - prepolymer , activation energy , polymer chemistry , polymerization , condensation polymer , ethylene , end group , kinetics , kinetic energy , reaction rate constant , materials science , intrinsic viscosity , reaction rate , polyester , chemistry , polymer , organic chemistry , catalysis , composite material , physics , quantum mechanics , polyurethane
A simple kinetic model capable of describing the behaviors of solid‐state polymerization (SSP) of poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET) has been developed. According to this model, there are two types of end groups, namely active end groups and inactive end groups, and the solid‐state polycondensation reaction is a second‐order reaction with respect to the active end group concentration. The inactive end groups include chemically dead end groups and functional end groups that are immobilized by the crystalline structure. The inactive end group concentration determines the ultimate intrinsic viscosity (IV) or molecular weight achievable in the SSP—the lower the inactive end group concentration, the higher the ultimate IV. Four pulverized PET prepolymers with IV values ranging from 0.20 to 0.35 dL/g were solid‐state polymerized in a fluid‐bed reactor at temperatures between 200 and 230°C to generate data to test the model. The experimental results fit the proposed rate equations very well, confirming the adequacy of the proposed kinetic model. Under these SSP conditions, the activation energy is about 23.6 kcal/mol and the average SSP rate about doubles with each 10°C increase in temperature. The rate constant increases, while the inactive end group concentration decreases, with increasing temperature and prepolymer IV. This explains why the reaction rate and the ultimate IV increase with increasing prepolymer IV as well as temperature in the SSP of PET. © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 81: 1748–1761, 2001

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here