Premium
Study on polyethylene glycol/polydimethylsiloxane mixing soft‐segment waterborne polyurethane from different mixing processes
Author(s) -
Yen MengShung,
Tsai PingYuan
Publication year - 2003
Publication title -
journal of applied polymer science
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.575
H-Index - 166
eISSN - 1097-4628
pISSN - 0021-8995
DOI - 10.1002/app.12640
Subject(s) - polydimethylsiloxane , polyurethane , materials science , copolymer , polyethylene glycol , peg ratio , polymer chemistry , polyethylene , glass transition , chemical engineering , membrane , composite material , polymer , chemistry , biochemistry , finance , engineering , economics
The surface structure and physical properties of polyethylene glycol series polyurethane (PEG‐PU) membranes, in which were introduced hydrophobic polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) component by the procedure of PU blending or of soft‐segment copolymerization, were studied in this investigation. In the case of the blending process, the synthesized waterborne polyurethanes (WBPUs) of PEG–PU and of polydimethylsiloxane series polyurethane (PDMS–PU) were combined, whereas in the copolymerization process PEG and PDMS were taken as mixed soft segments to polymerize the WBPU. For the blending method, glass‐transition and melting temperatures increased rapidly when a small amount of PDMS–PU was added to PEG–PU and reached a maximum with 5% PDMS–PU mixed in. However, in the case of the copolymer method, thermal properties closely followed predicted values. From dynamic mechanical analysis studies it was found that a low PDMS–PU content ratio could increase the rubbery elasticity of PEG–PU membrane and improve its strength simultaneously in the blending method, and the copolymer method only caused PU to gain some natural complementary strength and elasticity. Electron spectroscopy for chemical analysis studies indicated that PDMS migrated to the surface much more easily in the blending method than in the copolymer method. The SEM studies also found that, in the blending method, the numbers of pores were less than those in the copolymer method. © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 90: 233–243, 2003