z-logo
Premium
Mechanical and barrier properties of edible starch–protein‐based films
Author(s) -
Jagannath J. H.,
Nanjappa C.,
Das Gupta D. K.,
Bawa A. S.
Publication year - 2003
Publication title -
journal of applied polymer science
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.575
H-Index - 166
eISSN - 1097-4628
pISSN - 0021-8995
DOI - 10.1002/app.11602
Subject(s) - miscibility , materials science , gelatin , differential scanning calorimetry , casein , ultimate tensile strength , starch , relative humidity , chemical engineering , wax , composite material , water vapor , carnauba wax , polymer chemistry , polymer , chemistry , organic chemistry , physics , engineering , thermodynamics
Abstract The present investigation dealt with the mechanical properties, water‐vapor transmission behavior at different relative humidity conditions, and DSC thermograms of edible films formulated using various proteins (casein, gelatin, albumin) in combination with starch and nonthermal as well as intense thermal blending. Nonthermal blended film showed in the DSC thermogram a double T g , indicating poor miscibility of the components and, hence, a poor film‐forming property. However, the DSC thermogram of all the films based on intense thermal blending showed a single T g , indicating the complete molecular miscibility of the components. Casein‐based film showed a lower water‐vapor transmission rate, water gain at different relative humidity conditions, and higher tensile strength compared to its counterparts containing gelatin and albumin. Since the casein–starch blend gave better film properties, a blend of hydrophobic carnauba wax and casein was prepared to compare the properties of hydrophilic–hydrophilic and hydrophobic–hydrophilic blends. Both these blends compared well with respect to the water‐vapor transmission rate. Wax‐based film showed multiphased behavior in the DSC thermograms and the percent elongation was lower as compared to the casein–starch blend. © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 88: 64–71, 2003

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here