Premium
Mirror‐Image Dependence: Targeting Enantiomeric G‐Quadruplex DNA Using Triplex Metallohelices
Author(s) -
Zhao Chuanqi,
Song Hualong,
Scott Peter,
Zhao Andong,
TateishiKarimata Hisae,
Sugimoto Naoki,
Ren Jinsong,
Qu Xiaogang
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
angewandte chemie international edition
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 5.831
H-Index - 550
eISSN - 1521-3773
pISSN - 1433-7851
DOI - 10.1002/anie.201809207
Subject(s) - dna , enantiomer , chemistry , stereochemistry , g quadruplex , entropy (arrow of time) , dna sequencing , biophysics , crystallography , biochemistry , biology , physics , quantum mechanics
Natural d ‐DNA and l ‐DNA are mirror‐image counterparts. However, because of the inherent flexibility and conformation diversity of DNA, it is still not clear how enantiomeric compounds recognize d ‐DNA and l ‐DNA. Herein, taking G‐quadruplex (G4) DNA as an example that has diverse conformations and distinct biofunctions, the binding of ten pairs of iron triplex metallohelices to d ‐ and l ‐G4 DNA were evaluated. The Δ‐enantiomer binds to d ‐DNA and the Λ‐enantiomer binds to l ‐DNA, exhibiting almost the same stabilization effect and binding affinity. The binding affinity of the Δ‐metallohelix with d ‐G4 is nearly 70‐fold higher than that of Λ‐metallohelix binding d ‐G4. Δ‐Metallohelix binding to d ‐G4 follows a two‐step binding process driven by a favorable enthalpy contribution to compensate for the associated unfavorable entropy.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom