z-logo
Premium
Promoting Difficult Carbon–Carbon Couplings: Which Ligand Does Best?
Author(s) -
Gioria Estefanía,
del Pozo Juan,
MartínezIlarduya Jesús M.,
Espinet Pablo
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
angewandte chemie international edition
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 5.831
H-Index - 550
eISSN - 1521-3773
pISSN - 1433-7851
DOI - 10.1002/anie.201607089
Subject(s) - xantphos , ligand (biochemistry) , chemistry , stereochemistry , coupling (piping) , carbon fibers , hydrolysis , medicinal chemistry , catalysis , palladium , organic chemistry , mathematics , materials science , biochemistry , algorithm , composite number , receptor , metallurgy
Abstract A Pd complex, cis ‐[Pd(C 6 F 5 ) 2 (THF) 2 ] ( 1 ), is proposed as a useful touchstone for direct and simple experimental measurement of the relative ability of ancillary ligands to induce C−C coupling. Interestingly, 1 is also a good alternative to other precatalysts used to produce Pd 0 L. Complex  1 ranks the coupling ability of some popular ligands in the order P t Bu 3 > o ‐TolPEWO‐F≈ t BuXPhos>P(C 6 F 5 ) 3 ≈PhPEWO‐F>P( o ‐Tol) 3 ≈THF≈ t BuBrettPhos≫Xantphos≈PhPEWO‐H≫PPh 3 according to their initial coupling rates, whereas their efficiency, depending on competitive hydrolysis, is ranked t BuXPhos≈P t Bu 3 ≈ o ‐TolPEWO‐F>PhPEWO‐F>P(C 6 F 5 ) 3 ≫ t BuBrettPhos>THF≈P( o ‐Tol) 3 >Xantphos>PhPEWO‐H≫PPh 3 . This “meter” also detects some other possible virtues or complications of ligands such as t BuXPhos or t BuBrettPhos.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom