Electrochemical Versus Heat‐Engine Energy Technology: A Tribute to Wilhelm Ostwald’s Visionary Statements | Zendy

Kunze Julia | Zendy; Stimming Ulrich | Zendy

AI Assistant Blog Pricing

Home ZAIA Blog

Premium

Electrochemical Versus Heat‐Engine Energy Technology: A Tribute to Wilhelm Ostwald’s Visionary Statements

Author(s) -

Kunze Julia,

Stimming Ulrich

Publication year - 2009

Publication title -

angewandte chemie international edition

Language(s) - English

Resource type - Journals

SCImago Journal Rank - 5.831

H-Index - 550

eISSN - 1521-3773

pISSN - 1433-7851

DOI - 10.1002/anie.200903603

Subject(s) - carnot cycle , electrochemistry , tribute , electrochemical energy conversion , thermodynamics , energy (signal processing) , fuel cells , materials science , chemistry , chemical engineering , engineering , physics , electrode , art history , art , quantum mechanics

Carnot versus electrochemistry : This essay critically compares the advantages and disadvantages of Carnot‐cycle‐based and electrochemical methods for the generation and storage of energy (see picture; left: PEM fuel cell; right: Au(111) model surface covered with 0.025 monolayers of Pt). The views of Wilhelm Ostwald (1853–1932) and today's understanding of energy conversion are contrasted.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here

Accelerating Research