z-logo
Premium
One or Several Pioneers? The Discovery of Noble‐Gas Compounds
Author(s) -
Laszlo Pierre,
Schrobilgen Gary J.
Publication year - 1988
Publication title -
angewandte chemie international edition in english
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 5.831
H-Index - 550
eISSN - 1521-3773
pISSN - 0570-0833
DOI - 10.1002/anie.198804791
Subject(s) - scientific discovery , noble gas , quarter (canadian coin) , style (visual arts) , history , space (punctuation) , sort , computer science , chemistry , psychology , archaeology , cognitive science , information retrieval , organic chemistry , operating system
For the general public, science history and restaurant menus share a labeling style. Like Melba peach, Soubise sauce, or tournedos Rossini, many a scientific discovery is credited to a single thinker or tinkerer. Such ultrasimplification rubs into oblivion other important contributors or codiscoverers. The discovery of noble‐gas compounds conforms to such a stereotyped and mythic view: according to the standard account, Neil S. Bartlett , then at the University of British Columbia, made it a quarter of a century ago on March 23, 1962. We do not attempt here a full and definitive history; it would be premature and we do not have the space. Rather, we shall document the concept and the earlier attempts at synthesis–they antedated Bartlett 's success by three decades. The motivation for this note may be summarized in the following questions: (1) What sort of insight and input were those of Linus Pauling ? (2) What were the likely causes for failure of the attempt by Yost and Kaye to synthesize noble‐gas fluorides in the 1930s? (3) Were there other researchers who envisioned a noble‐gas reactivity?

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here