Premium
Decreased incidence of childhood narcolepsy 2 years after the 2009 H1N1 winter flu pandemic
Author(s) -
Han Fang,
Lin Ling,
Li Jing,
Dong Xiao Song,
Mignot Emmanuel
Publication year - 2013
Publication title -
annals of neurology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 4.764
H-Index - 296
eISSN - 1531-8249
pISSN - 0364-5134
DOI - 10.1002/ana.23799
Subject(s) - beijing , medicine , sleep medicine , narcolepsy , annals , family medicine , pediatrics , china , neurology , psychiatry , classics , history , sleep disorder , political science , law , cognition
increased several fold in China following the H1N1 winter flu pandemic (pH1N1). 1 In parallel with this report, increased incidence was also reported in several countries in Northern Europe, with many children developing the disease following administration of Pandemrix, an adjuvanted pH1N1 vaccine. Studies in Sweden, Finland, and Norway have shown a 4- to 13fold increased risk of developing childhood narcolepsy following Pandemrix (only 1 of 16,000 vaccinated children developed narcolepsy, however). 2–4 These results bolster the claim that narcolepsy, an autoimmune disease caused by hypocretin cell loss, could be triggered by H1N1 vaccination or infection. Further evidence of causality may come from studying narcolepsy incidence following the 2009 pandemic, as H1N1 infections decreased in subsequent seasons. In the Figure, we report on the evolution of new onset cases at Beijing University People’s Hospital. For better comparison, we only present data on cases diagnosed within 1 year of onset, so that data are comparable to prior years. Data from 2012 are also included, although curtailed after September, so that a few cases with onset in the first 3 months of 2012 will still be identified (denoted with a star and not used in any statistical analysis). As can be seen, a return to baseline is evident, suggesting that the 2009–2010 winter was a unique event. We next examined whether patients identified following the pH1N1 pandemic season differed clinically. As before, to avoid issues pertaining to evaluation time since onset, we only compared subjects diagnosed within 1 year of onset. In 1998–2009, 2010, and 2011 respectively, 187, 201, and 49 subjects were identified (mean 6 standard error of the mean delay to diagnosis: 4.7 6 0.3, 4.4 6 0.2, and 4.6 6 0.4 months). Sex, body mass index, age at diagnosis, occurrence and age of onset of each narcolepsy symptom (ie, sleepiness, cataplexy, sleep paralysis, hypnagogic hallucination, and disturbed nocturnal sleep), and sleep recording findings (Multiple Sleep Latency Test, Apnea Hypopnea Index) were next compared across the 3 groups. Remarkably few differences were found. First, although mean age of onset in subjects diagnosed in 2010 was younger than in those diagnosed before and after 2010, differences were not statistically significant (8.7 6 0.4 years in 2010 vs 10.0 6 0.7 years before and 10.1 6 1.7 years in 2011, p ¼ 0.2). Second, sleep-onset rapid eye movement periods during the multiple latency tests were more numerous in cases diagnosed in 2010 versus others, whether or not controlled with age (4.65 6 0.05 in 2010 vs 4.32 6 0.05 before and 4.00 6 0.18 years in 2011, p < 0.001), suggesting increased severity. All other parameters were similar across groups. We conclude that pH1N1 infections during the 2009–2010 season have likely played a role in triggering narcolepsy in children, but that the phenotypes of these cases is not distinguishable from prior cases.