z-logo
Premium
Antemortem diagnosis of frontotemporal lobar degeneration
Author(s) -
Knopman David S.,
Boeve Bradley F.,
Parisi Joseph E.,
Dickson Dennis W.,
Smith Glenn E.,
Ivnik Robert J.,
Josephs Keith A.,
Petersen Ronald C.
Publication year - 2005
Publication title -
annals of neurology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 4.764
H-Index - 296
eISSN - 1531-8249
pISSN - 0364-5134
DOI - 10.1002/ana.20425
Subject(s) - frontotemporal lobar degeneration , medical diagnosis , dementia , medicine , pathological , frontotemporal dementia , neuropsychology , autopsy , neuroimaging , pick's disease , magnetic resonance imaging , vascular dementia , pathology , disease , psychiatry , radiology , cognition
The objective of this article is to study the accuracy of antemortem clinical diagnoses of frontotemporal lobar degenerations (FTLDs). From brain autopsies performed on subjects enrolled in the Mayo Alzheimer Center between 1991 and 2003, cases with neuropathological diagnoses of FTLD were identified. Neuropathological diagnoses of FTLDs were based on consensus criteria for FTLD. The initial clinical histories, neuropsychological test results, brain imaging studies, and initial clinical diagnoses were reviewed. There were 34 pathological FTLD cases among 433 subjects who underwent autopsy; 29 of these 34 cases were diagnosed as FTLD antemortem based on the sum of clinical, neuropsychological, and imaging features (sensitivity, 85%). The specificity was 99%. Among the 34 cases with pathological FTLD, 27 (79%) had clinical histories diagnostic of an FTLD syndrome, 20 (62%) had neuropsychological profiles consistent with FTLD, 17 (50%) had magnetic resonance scans consistent with FTLD, and 7 of 8 who had functional imaging studies had ones consistent with FTLD. In those with incorrect antemortem diagnoses, three were thought to have Alzheimer's disease, one was considered hard to classify, and one was diagnosed with vascular dementia. The antemortem consensus diagnosis of FTLD was moderately sensitive and very specific. With experienced clinicians and awareness of the unique manifestations of FTLD, accurate antemortem diagnosis was feasible. Ann Neurol 2005;57:480–488

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here