z-logo
Premium
Impaired sequence learning in carriers of the DYT1 dystonia mutation
Author(s) -
Ghilardi MariaFelice,
Carbon Maren,
Silvestri Giulia,
Dhawan Vijay,
Tagliati Michele,
Bressman Susan,
Ghez Claude,
Eidelberg David
Publication year - 2003
Publication title -
annals of neurology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 4.764
H-Index - 296
eISSN - 1531-8249
pISSN - 0364-5134
DOI - 10.1002/ana.10610
Subject(s) - cerebellum , neuroscience , dystonia , supplementary motor area , premotor cortex , motor cortex , psychology , medicine , functional magnetic resonance imaging , anatomy , stimulation , dorsum
Abstract Previous positron emission tomography (PET) studies have shown that nonmanifesting carriers of the DYT1 dystonia mutation express an abnormal pattern of resting glucose metabolism. To determine whether motor behavior is impaired in these subjects, we compared movement and sequence learning in 12 clinically unaffected DYT1 carriers with 12 age‐matched controls. Regional differences in brain function during task performance were assessed with simultaneous H 2 15 O/PET. We found that motor performance was similar in the DYT1 and control groups, with no significant differences in movement time and spatial accuracy measured during each of the tasks. In contrast, sequence learning was reduced in gene carriers relative to controls ( p < 0.01). PET imaging during motor execution showed increased activation in gene carriers ( p < 0.001, uncorrected) in the left premotor cortex and right supplementary motor area, with concomitant reduction in the posterior medial cerebellum. During sequence learning, activation responses in DYT1 carriers were increased in the left ventral prefrontal cortex, and lateral cerebellum. These findings suggest that abnormalities in motor behavior and brain function exist in clinically nonmanifesting DYT1 carriers. Although localized increases in neural activity may enable normal movement execution in these subjects, this mechanism may not compensate for their defect in sequence learning. Ann Neurol 2003;54:102–109

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here