Open AccessA physician‐staffed ground emergency medical service does not significantly shorten door‐to‐balloon time in patients with STEMI: an observational study in a single emergency center in Japan
Author(s) -
Yoshioka Yuki,
Teshima Ryota,
Gamo Mina,
Yoneda Ryuhei,
Matsunaga Naoki,
Takada Tadaaki,
Fukuta Yasushi,
Kishi Koichi
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
acute medicine and surgery
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
ISSN - 2052-8817
DOI - 10.1002/ams2.542
Subject(s) - medicine , interquartile range , door to balloon , observational study , emergency department , emergency medicine , emergency medical services , emergency physician , single center , myocardial infarction , medical emergency , percutaneous coronary intervention , nursing , primary angioplasty
Aim Current guidelines recommend a door‐to‐balloon time (DTBT) of <90 min for reperfusion treatment of patients with ST‐segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). A physician‐staffed ground emergency medical service (GEMS) using a rapid response car (RRC) system was implemented at our hospital in April 2015. The medical team, including a physician and nurse, is dispatched to assess the patient and expedite the start of treatment by emergency physicians and cardiologists after arrival at the hospital. The study aimed to determine whether the RRC system shortened the DTBT. Methods This retrospective observational study was carried out in a tertiary emergency center in Japan. Those STEMI patients with primary percutaneous intervention between January 2016 and December 2018 were evaluated. The DTBTs of patients transported by the RRC system, the emergency medical service (EMS), and transferred from other hospitals after STEMI diagnosis (TRANS group) were compared. Results A total of 121 patients were included, 33 in the RCC, 20 in the EMS, and 68 in the TRANS groups. The median DTBT was 51 min (interquartile range [IQR], 43–67) in the RRC, 61 min (IQR, 52–85) in the EMS, and 59 min (IQR, 48–72) in the TRANS groups ( P = 0.13). The DTBT was not significantly shorter in the RRC than in the other groups. Conclusion An RRC physician‐staffed GEMS did not significantly shorten the DTBT of patients with STEMI compared with other transport systems.