Premium
Evidence for the role of semantic cueing and executive functioning tools in early and differential diagnosis of neurocognitive disorder (NCD): A neuropsychological approach
Author(s) -
Abbatantuono Chiara,
Taurisano Paolo,
Pepe Ilaria,
Clemente Livio,
Alfeo Federica,
Ricciardi Elisabetta,
Calia Clara,
Lancioni Giulio,
De Caro Maria Fara
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
alzheimer's and dementia
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 6.713
H-Index - 118
eISSN - 1552-5279
pISSN - 1552-5260
DOI - 10.1002/alz.052527
Subject(s) - psychology , neurocognitive , neuropsychology , episodic memory , audiology , executive functions , neuropsychological assessment , cognition , boston naming test , clinical psychology , trail making test , psychiatry , medicine
Background Recent advances in the diagnosis of Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) and Neurocognitive Disorders (NCDs) build on neuropsychological models (Dodich et al., 2018; Possin et al., 2018). Despite the lack of harmonized protocols (Costa et al., 2017), tools such as the Free and Cued Selective Reminding Test (FCSRT) yield specific scores (e.g., ISC for cue sensitivity) for the early detection of hippocampal syndromes involved in Alzheimer’s Disease (AD), and for the prediction of MCI‐to‐AD conversion (Brugnolo et al., 2021). Accordingly, the study aims to investigate the correlation between neuropsychological profiles and cognitive patterns through an extensive assessment procedure accounting for the heterogeneity of MCI and NCDs. Methods N=150 outpatients (mean age=72.29±5.42 SD) were administered a battery meeting both MCI (Petersen et al., 2014) and NCD criteria (APA, 2013) including: two screening tools; ten domain‐specific cognitive tests; psychodiagnostic‐functional assessment. Analyses through paired‐sample tests and multivariate models focused on: (1) episodic memory and executive deficits; (2) predictive indices for MCI/NCD diagnosis. Results 70.7% of the clinical sample obtained scores consistent with MCI or mildNCD profiles, and 75% showed episodic memory impairment on cut‐off basis (FCSRT‐ISC<0.9). Wilcoxon signed‐rank test revealed poorer performance in FCSRT‐ISC compared to Babcock Story‐IR (p‐value<0,001<α=0,05), notably in MCI/mildNCDs but not in majorNCDs. The full sample and MCI/mildNCD subset also obtained lower scores in Digit Span Backward (DS‐B) than in the Clock Drawing Test (CDT), whereas majorNCD performed worse in CDT. Logistic regression showed three predictive indices for majorNCD: the lower the scores on FCSRT‐IFR, DS‐B and CDT, the greater the chances of fitting majorNCD profile. Conclusion Driven by the need for early and differential diagnosis of NCDs, our findings showed episodic memory impairment within the total sample and the MCI/mildNCD subsets, indicating: (1) a high prevalence of AD‐type MCI/mildNCDs; (2) the possible key role of FCSRT‐ISC in detecting early or mild conditions of impairment; (3) the good predictive values (86%) of some memory (i.e. FCSRT‐IFR) and executive tasks (i.e. DS‐B and CDT) contributing to a major NCD diagnosis, potentially enhancing NCD nosography and differential diagnosis.