Premium
Psychotherapeutic interventions in individuals at risk for Alzheimer’s dementia: A systematic review
Author(s) -
Rostamzadeh Ayda,
Kahlert Anna,
Kalthegener Franziska,
Jessen Frank
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
alzheimer's and dementia
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 6.713
H-Index - 118
eISSN - 1552-5279
pISSN - 1552-5260
DOI - 10.1002/alz.047269
Subject(s) - psychological intervention , dementia , psycinfo , anxiety , psychology , clinical psychology , quality of life (healthcare) , disease , depression (economics) , intervention (counseling) , cognition , psychotherapist , psychiatry , medline , medicine , law , economics , macroeconomics , political science
Abstract Background Expanding technologies of early detection of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) allow to identify individuals at‐risk in very early and asymptomatic disease stages. Neuropsychiatric symptoms, such as anxiety and depression, are common in in the course of AD and may be clinically observed many years before the onset of significant cognitive symptoms. To date, therapeutic interventions for AD focus on pharmacological and non‐pharmacological strategies. However, despite good evidence for psychotherapy in late‐life depression, evidence for such therapeutic options in the course of cognitive decline related to AD is sparse. Method A systematic review was conducted in PUBMED, PsycINFO and Web of Science to summarize the state of evidence on psychotherapeutic‐psychoeducational interventions for individuals at‐risk for Alzheimer’s dementia. Eligible articles needed to apply a manualized and standardized psychotherapeutic or psychotherapeutic‐psychoeducational intervention administered by trained professionals for individuals with subjective cognitive decline (SCD) or mild cognitive impairment (MCI). Result The literature search yielded 35 studies that were included in this narrative summery. The data illustrates heterogeneous therapeutic approaches with mostly small sample sizes of study participants and short follow‐up monitoring. There is evidence that interventions have an antidepressive effect and a positive impact on disease acceptance, including positive effects on life quality. However, specific therapeutic determinants of efficacy have not been identified to date. Conclusion This review underlines the need of specific psychotherapeutic‐psychoeducational therapeutic approaches for individuals at‐risk of Alzheimer’s dementia, particularly in terms of early interventions aiming at improving well‐being, mental health and quality of life in the course of the neurodegenerative disease. One paramount challenge is the modification of psychotherapeutic techniques according to the different stages of cognitive decline in the course of AD, which is needed to be sensitive to the individual needs and preferences.