Premium
Validation of a simplified tissue‐to‐reference ratio measurement using SUVR for the assessment of synaptic density alterations in Alzheimer’s disease using [ 11 C]UCB‐J PET
Author(s) -
O'Dell Ryan S.,
Naganawa Mika,
Toyonaga Takuya,
Young Juan,
Dahal Rabin,
Singh Edward,
Waheed Aisha,
Banks Emmie R.,
Harris Joanna E.,
Chen MingKai,
Nabulsi Nabeel B.,
Huang Yiyun,
Carson Richard E.,
van Dyck Christopher H.,
Mecca Adam P.
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
alzheimer's and dementia
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 6.713
H-Index - 118
eISSN - 1552-5279
pISSN - 1552-5260
DOI - 10.1002/alz.045928
Subject(s) - nuclear medicine , standardized uptake value , positron emission tomography , correlation , medicine , biomarker , pathology , chemistry , mathematics , biochemistry , geometry
Background Synaptic density PET is an emerging technology with potential as a biomarker for tracking disease progression and therapeutic efficacy in studies of Alzheimer's disease (AD). Simplified methods of image acquisition and quantification would facilitate the use of synaptic density imaging in multicenter longitudinal studies. Therefore, we validated a simplified tissue‐to‐reference ratio method using standardized uptake value ratios ( SUVR ) for estimating synaptic density using [ 11 C]UCB‐J PET. Method [ 11 C]UCB‐J binding was measured in 31 participants with early AD and 16 cognitively normal (CN) participants aged 55‐85 years. All participants underwent 90 minute dynamic PET scans on the HRRT after bolus injection of [ 11 C]UCB‐J. Parametric images of binding potential ( BP ND ) were generated using SRTM2 (0‐60 minutes) with a centrum semiovale reference region and converted to distribution volume ratios ( DVR ) with a cerebellum reference region. Parametric images of SUVR were generated by summing frames from 30‐60 or 60‐90 minutes and normalizing to the cerebellum. Regional group differences were assessed using unpaired t tests and Cohen’s d, while associations between DVR and SUVR were assessed using Pearson’s correlation. Result Widespread reductions in cortical and subcortical synaptic density were observed in AD (vs. CN) participants using measures of DVR , SUVR 30‐60min , and SUVR 60‐90min . In the entire sample, stronger regional correlations between measures of DVR and SUVR 60‐90min (r=0.97, p<0.00001) were observed compared to DVR and SUVR 30‐60min (r=0.91, p<0.00001; Figure 1). The correlation between DVR and SUVR 60‐90min was also stronger for within‐group correlations ( DVR vs. SUVR 60‐90min r CN =0.97, r AD =0.97; DVR vs. SUVR 30‐60min r CN =0.90, r AD =0.91). The within‐region correlation between measures of DVR and SUVR 60‐90min ranged from 0.77 to 0.97 (p<0.00001) in the entire sample. Effect sizes to determine group differences in SV2A binding across all regions were highly correlated between both DVR and SUVR 60‐90min (r=0.93, p<0.00001) and DVR and SUVR 30‐60min (r=0.93, p<0.00001; Figure 2). Conclusion A simplified method of quantifying synaptic density with SUVR using a shortened (60‐90 minute) scan window and cerebellum reference region is highly correlated with measures of DVR generated with SRTM2 kinetic modeling. This simplified tissue‐to‐reference ratio methodology may be of practical use for multicenter and longitudinal studies seeking to measure synaptic density in AD.