z-logo
Premium
Genome‐wide meta‐analysis of late‐onset Alzheimer’s disease using rare variant imputation in 65,602 subjects identifies risk loci with roles in memory, neurodevelopment, and cardiometabolic traits: The international genomics of Alzheimer’s project (IGAP)
Author(s) -
Naj Adam C.,
Sha Jin,
Zhao Yi,
Leonenko Ganna,
Jian Xueqiu,
GrenierBoley Benjamin,
Dalmasso Maria Carolina,
van der Lee Sven J.,
Sims Rebecca,
Chouraki Vincent,
Bis Josh C.,
Kuzma Amanda B.,
Kunkle Brian W.,
KaramujićČomić Hata,
Pitsillides Achilleas N.,
Xia Rui,
FultonHoward Brian,
Holmans Peter,
Dupuis Josée,
Wang LiSan,
Farrer Lindsay A.,
van Duijn Cornelia M.,
Haines Jonathan L.,
Destefano Anita L.,
PericakVance Margaret A.,
Ramirez Alfredo,
Amouyel Philippe,
Lambert JeanCharles,
Seshadri Sudha,
Williams Julie,
Schellenberg Gerard D.
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
alzheimer's and dementia
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 6.713
H-Index - 118
eISSN - 1552-5279
pISSN - 1552-5260
DOI - 10.1002/alz.044193
Subject(s) - imputation (statistics) , genome wide association study , minor allele frequency , 1000 genomes project , genetics , meta analysis , biology , genetic association , single nucleotide polymorphism , allele frequency , genotype , medicine , missing data , gene , statistics , mathematics
Background Recent meta‐analyses of genome‐wide association studies (GWAS) have identified ∼30 susceptibility LOAD loci in addition to APOE , however the majority are common variants (minor allele frequency (MAF)>0.02). We used the dense, high‐resolution Haplotype Reference Consortium (HRC) r1.1 reference panel (64,976 haplotypes/39,235,157 SNPs), which allows imputation of rare variants (MAF>0.0008), to impute 44 GWAS datasets of the IGAP consortia to identify novel rare variant, gene, and pathway associations. Method We imputed 25,192 cases and 40,410 controls to the HRC r1.1 panel using Minimac3 on the Michigan Imputation Server. Converting imputed genotype probabilities to minor allele dosage, we ran logistic regression using SNPTEST on individual variants with MAF > 0.01 (and using generalized linear mixed models in R with family‐based datasets), and performed a fixed‐effects, inverse‐variance‐weighted meta‐analysis using METAL. Variants with MAF ≤ 0.01 were meta‐analyzed using score‐based tests via SeqMeta/R. Both analyses adjusted for age‐at‐onset(cases)/age‐at‐exam(controls), sex, and principal components for population substructure. Gene‐based associations were done with SKAT‐O and burden testing, while pathway associations were examined using VEGAS2. Result Discovery analyses of ∼39.2M genotyped or imputed SNVs confirmed single variant associations in 26 of 30 known IGAP LOAD loci at suggestive levels of significance ( P  < 10 −5 ), with 12 known loci attaining genome‐wide statistical significance ( P  < 5 × 10 −8 ) (Figure 1). Newly observed associations included common variants (MAF>0.01) in or near homologs of known AD loci, EPHA5 (rs17086136, OR[95% CI] = 1.23 [1.13,1.33], P  = 6.36 × 10 −7 ) and ADAM28 (rs10096379, OR[95% CI] = 0.86 [0.81,0.92], P  = 3.02 × 10 −6 ); in/near neuronal development genes including DAB1 (neuronal migration; 1:57700874:T:G, OR[95% CI] = 0.71 [0.62, 0.81], P  = 6.94 × 10 −7 ) and DCC (axon guidance; rs2054289, OR[95% CI] = 0.71 [0.62, 0.83], P  = 6.69 × 10 −6 ); and in/near genes involved in cardiometabolic traits including THADA (type 2 diabetes; rs77101426, OR[95% CI] = 0.89 [0.85, 0.95], P  = 2.37 × 10 −6 ). Several known AD loci demonstrated novel rare variant associations with genome‐wide significance, including CR1 , PICALM , and the MS4A region (Figure 2), and novel rare variant associations were observed in or near genes involved in memory and cognitive function, including HS3ST4 and DBX1 . Independent replication in external datasets including the UK Biobank is on‐going. Conclusion Several novel LOAD candidate loci, including those with prior associations with neurodevelopment and cardiometabolic traits, were identified using high‐quality imputation of rare and low‐frequency variants in IGAP.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here