Premium
Defining longitudinal change on the auditory verbal learning test using a conditional normative model to account for practice effects: Preliminary validation in preclinical Alzheimer’s disease
Author(s) -
Alden Eva,
Lundt Emily S.,
Christianson Teresa J.,
Machulda Mary M.,
Kremers Walter K.,
Jack Clifford R.,
Knopman David S.,
Petersen Ronald C.,
Mielke Michelle M.,
Stricker Nikki H.
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
alzheimer's and dementia
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 6.713
H-Index - 118
eISSN - 1552-5279
pISSN - 1552-5260
DOI - 10.1002/alz.043988
Subject(s) - normative , psychology , cognition , cognitive decline , verbal learning , alzheimer's disease neuroimaging initiative , recall , clinical psychology , audiology , developmental psychology , gerontology , disease , medicine , cognitive psychology , cognitive impairment , psychiatry , dementia , philosophy , epistemology
Background Practice effects can obscure interpretation of longitudinal cognitive performance. Reliable change indices (RCIs) provide data for determining a significant change, typically for a single repeat assessment, but multiple follow‐up visits are common clinically and in research cohorts. Further, regression‐based or linear mixed effects models improve prediction of future cognitive decline and have higher correlations with neuroimaging biomarkers than RCI approaches. We present norms for change for the Auditory Verbal Learning Tests (AVLT) with conditional normative z‐scores for up to 7 repeat assessments, and demonstrate application of this method to individuals with preclinical Alzheimer’s disease (AD). Method Normative Sample: Robust conditional norms were derived from 1001 adults ages 50‐90 from the Mayo Clinic Study of Aging (MCSA) who completed the AVLT across 4‐8 visits approximately 15 months apart and remained cognitively unimpaired (CU) across all available visits. Linear mixed effects models were used to compute a conditional normative z‐score for AVLT 30‐minute recall and sum of trials. Models included adjustment for baseline performance, number of prior test exposures, demographic factors (age, sex, education), and interactions (baseline*time; sex*time). Test Sample: We used a preclinical AD sample with positive amyloid and tau imaging (n= 27 CU A+T+; Jack et al. 2017) expected to have a higher rate of intra‐individual cognitive decline relative to CU A‐T‐ individuals (n = 268) to compare mean performances of conditional normative z‐scores to typical age‐corrected Mayo’s Older Americans Normative Studies (MOANS) norms. Participants had at least 1 and up to 4 follow‐up visits, with their most recent AT data used for classification. Result AVLT performance based on typical norms did not differ across A+T+ and A‐T‐ groups. Specifically, across 2‐4 follow‐up visits, the typical norms mean z‐score was similar across groups ( p =0.945; see Table 1). However, the conditional norms mean z‐score that accounts for practice effects and typical trajectories of AVLT performance was lower in the A+T+ relative to the A‐T‐ group for 30‐minute recall ( p =0.055) and sum of trials ( p =0.060). Conclusion Conditional normative methods that account for practice effects are more sensitive to preclinical AD than typical norms, and show promise for identifying transitional cognitive decline.