Premium
Attitudes towards people with dementia: Questionnaire validation and comparison between Germany and China
Author(s) -
Zhu Lin,
Schall Arthur,
Tesky Valentina Antonia,
Paulitsch Michael,
Pantel Johannes
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
alzheimer's and dementia
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 6.713
H-Index - 118
eISSN - 1552-5279
pISSN - 1552-5260
DOI - 10.1002/alz.042792
Subject(s) - dementia , cronbach's alpha , german , china , mandarin chinese , psychology , population , consistency (knowledge bases) , scale (ratio) , medicine , gerontology , clinical psychology , psychometrics , political science , geography , disease , archaeology , linguistics , philosophy , geometry , mathematics , environmental health , pathology , cartography , law
Background In both professional and family settings, attitudes towards dementia influence the way this group of patients is treated. It is therefore of great importance to conduct research into intercultural differences in attitudes towards dementia and then to adapt concepts of care to better suit the target population. This project examines the question whether differences exist in attitudes towards persons with dementia between Germany and China. Method The Dementia Attitudes Scale (DAS) has been validated for different European languages (English, German, French, Italian). For this study the DAS was professionally translated and validated for the Chinese language (Mandarin). Samples were recruited of the general population and of professional hospital nurses in both countries (total N of recruits: 195). Result Internal consistency was very good for both the Chinese and German versions of the DAS (Cronbach’s alpha > 0.8). The two groups differed in terms of experience with persons with dementia: Respondents in the German group had significantly more experience of interacting with persons with dementia. With regard to attitudes towards persons with dementia, the Chinese group had a more negative attitude than the German group. A comparison of the two sub‐groups “qualified personnel” with “general population” showed that professional knowledge has a positive influence. Conclusion This pilot study revealed differences in attitudes toward people with dementia between Germany and China. The reason for this (e.g. knowledge/education, cultural differences, personal experience) should be addressed in future studies. Ultimately this may help to increase the well‐being and quality of life of persons with dementia over the long term and in a culturally sensitive manner