Premium
Heterogeneity in longitudinal deterioration of white matter microstructural integrity in the population and its implications for cognitive aging
Author(s) -
Poulakis Konstantinos,
Reid Robert I.,
Przybelski Scott A.,
Knopman David S.,
GraffRadford Jonathan,
Lowe Val J.,
Mielke Michelle M.,
Machulda Mary M.,
Jack Clifford R.,
Petersen Ronald C.,
Westman Eric,
Vemuri Prashanthi
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
alzheimer's and dementia
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 6.713
H-Index - 118
eISSN - 1552-5279
pISSN - 1552-5260
DOI - 10.1002/alz.042669
Subject(s) - fractional anisotropy , longitudinal study , cognitive decline , white matter , dementia , diffusion mri , cognition , psychology , population , gerontology , medicine , neuroscience , pathology , magnetic resonance imaging , disease , environmental health , radiology
Background White matter (WM) changes are widely seen in the elderly due to aging and pathological processes and have significant impact on cognitive aging. It is critical to understand the heterogeneity and drivers (causes) of the longitudinal deterioration of WM microstructural integrity, especially in a population‐based sample, to provide mechanistic insights into cognitive and brain aging. Method Leveraging longitudinal diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) data from Mayo Clinic Study of Aging, we assessed whether individuals clustered based on distinct longitudinal fractional anisotropy (FA) trajectories. A total of 533 subjects (487 cognitively unimpaired, 62 with mild cognitive impairment and 4 with dementia diagnosis) aged ≥ 60 years and with at least two DTI scans (125 subjects had at least 3 scans) were included. To identify clusters of individuals with common FA profiles over time, we applied an in‐house longitudinal Bayesian mixed‐effects clustering analysis framework to the imaging data. Age at MRI accounted for the longitudinal component of the model, while sex and APOE4 carrier status were used as fixed effects. Result We identified four distinct clusters (Figure 1). We found that most WM tracts decline with age across all clusters but brainstem and association fibers were least likely to decline with aging. APOE4 carriership and amyloid deposition did not differ between the clusters. We found a resilient cluster of individuals (34%) (cluster 1) with better baseline WM and systemic vascular health who had a slower rate of cognitive and WM integrity decline over time. These individuals had highest baseline commissural and association fibers. The resilient group was in contrast to an “at risk” cluster of individuals (16%) (cluster 2) who had lower baseline WM integrity and systemic health and declined the fastest in both WM health and cognition over time Conclusion Longitudinal clustering of WM tracts provided insights into the differential aging of WM in the population which may be unrelated to Alzheimer’s disease pathophysiology. Measuring overall WM health and vulnerable tracts in the elderly can be useful as biomarkers and aid in the identification of “at risk” groups for prevention of future cognitive decline.