Premium
Validation of the Cognitive Telephone Screening Instrument (COGTEL) for detecting mild cognitive impairment and dementia due to Alzheimer's disease (AD)
Author(s) -
Alexopoulos Panagiotis,
Skondra Maria,
Charalampopoulou Marina,
Aligianni Souzana,
Kontogianni Evangelia,
Lentzari Iliana,
Vratsista Aikaterini,
Kliegel Matthias,
Politis Antonis
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
alzheimer's and dementia
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 6.713
H-Index - 118
eISSN - 1552-5279
pISSN - 1552-5260
DOI - 10.1002/alz.041461
Subject(s) - dementia , cognition , montreal cognitive assessment , cognitive impairment , receiver operating characteristic , mini–mental state examination , psychology , cognitive test , disease , alzheimer's disease , audiology , medicine , psychiatry , pathology
Background Cognitive assessment is necessary for diagnosing cognitive impairment. In epidemiologic surveys and genetic family studies cognitive tests that can be administered over the telephone are valuable tools. The Cognitive Telephone Screening Instrument (COGTEL) is a brief instrument for capturing interindividual differences in cognitive functioning, with the advantage of covering more cognitive domains than traditional screening tools such as the Mini‐mental State Examination (MMSE), as well as differentiating between individual performance levels in healthy older adults. Here, we report first evidence of the utility of the COGTEL in detecting mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and dementia due to Alzheimer’s disease (AD). Method The COGTEL was translated into Greek. Thereafter a bilingual expert not familiar with the original COGTEL made a back translation into English. The new version was very similar to the original one. The study refers to 30 and 22 patients with MCI and dementia due to AD, respectively. They fulfilled the international NIA‐AA diagnostic criteria. The study included 45 cognitively normal elderly individuals, too. The COGTEL was compared to the conventional modified Mini Mental State Examination (3MS). They were validated against an expert diagnosis based on a comprehensive diagnostic workup which included the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA). Statistical analysis was performed using the receiver‐operator‐characteristics (ROC) method. Result The COGTEL outperformed the 3MS in the distinction between cognitively unimpaired individuals and patients with MCI (Area under the curve, AUC: 0.94 vs. 0.89), whilst both instruments were excellent in identifying patients suffering from dementia due to AD (AUC in both cases 0.99). Conclusion The COGTEL is a short, practical and reliable telephone test for the identification of both MCI and dementia due to AD. It can serve as a useful instrument in studying normal cognition and cognitive impairment in aging in both clinical diagnostics and research projects. The lack of difference between COGTEL and 3MS in their capacity to detect dementia due to AD is probably attributable to the fact that healthy aging can in most cases be unambiguously distinguished from dementia due AD, while the distinction between MCI and healthy aging is more ambitious.