Premium
Distinct relationships of self‐reported subjective memory decline to neurodegeneration across the Alzheimer's clinical continuum
Author(s) -
Kuhn Elizabeth,
Perrotin Audrey,
Tomadesso Clémence,
Andre Claire,
Sherif Siya,
Bejanin Alexandre,
Touron Edelweiss,
Landeau Brigitte,
Mézenge Florence,
La Sayette Vincent De,
Vivien Denis,
Chetelat Gael
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
alzheimer's and dementia
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 6.713
H-Index - 118
eISSN - 1552-5279
pISSN - 1552-5260
DOI - 10.1002/alz.040780
Subject(s) - dementia , neurodegeneration , cognition , neuroimaging , cognitive decline , alzheimer's disease neuroimaging initiative , effects of sleep deprivation on cognitive performance , atrophy , psychology , cohort , medicine , neuroscience , audiology , cognitive impairment , disease
Background Self‐reported memory decline (SMD) is associated with increased risk of cognitive decline and neurodegeneration in patients with no or mild cognitive deficits, while diverging findings are reported in later clinical stages of the Alzheimer’s clinical continuum. Our aim is to provide a comprehensive overview of the relationships of SMD to brain volume and glucose metabolism across the entire cognitive spectrum, from normal cognition to dementia. Method We used data from two independent cohorts, including 180 participants from IMAP+ (64 controls, 30 subjective cognitive decline (SCD), 50 mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and 36 AD‐dementia patients) and 731 participants from ADNI (147 controls, 84 SCD, 369 MCI and 121 AD‐dementia). We assessed the voxelwise links between SMD and neuroimaging measures of atrophy (T1‐MRI GM volume) and hypometabolism (partial volume effect (PVE)‐corrected FDG‐PET data) within each cohort, and tested for an interactive effect of clinical stage or global cognitive impairment, to assess whether these links differed across cognitive/clinical stages. All analyses were adjusted for age, gender and education (p<0.005, cluster‐level corrected for multiple comparisons). Results We found only negative interactive effects of the cognitive/clinical stage, such that SMD and neuroimaging measures were negatively associated (more neurodegeneration with higher SMD) in early stages, while they were positively associated (more neurodegeneration with lower SMD) in late stages. This effect was particularly clear‐cut and similar in both cohorts for glucose metabolism and when splitting participants by cognitive stages (tercile of MMSE score; Figure 1), rather than by clinical groups (Figure 2), likely as the sampling of SCD and MCI patients differ between cohorts. Findings were recovered when using an episodic memory score instead of the MMSE to grade cognitive deficits’ severity, using PVE‐uncorrected FDG‐PET data, and restricting the analyses to the amyloid‐positive participants. Conclusion Our findings reveal a reverse relationship of SMD to neurodegeneration, indicating that SMD should be interpreted differently in early versus late stages of the Alzheimer’s clinical continuum. At early (e.g. SCD) stage, greater SMD is indicative of greater neurodegeneration, while at later stages (late MCI or dementia), lower SMD is indicative of greater neurodegeneration, probably as a reflect of anosognosia.