Premium
A ‘sea change’ for collective bargaining as the U.S. Supreme Court permits unions to agree to arbitration for discrimination claims
Author(s) -
Walsh Christopher
Publication year - 2009
Publication title -
alternatives to the high cost of litigation
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 1549-4381
pISSN - 1549-4373
DOI - 10.1002/alt.20279
Subject(s) - supreme court , arbitration , law , collective bargaining , economic justice , political science , majority opinion , sociology , law and economics
Last month's U.S. Supreme Court decision in 14 Penn Plaza LLC v. Pyett may signal a big change in the skills needed by labor arbitrators, according to Christopher Walsh, of Newark, N.J. He analyzes the case and tells readers what to expect as a result of Justice Clarence Thomas's majority opinion.