Premium
A ‘sea change’ for collective bargaining as the U.S. Supreme Court permits unions to agree to arbitration for discrimination claims
Author(s) -
Walsh Christopher
Publication year - 2009
Publication title -
alternatives to the high cost of litigation
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 1549-4381
pISSN - 1549-4373
DOI - 10.1002/alt.20279
Subject(s) - supreme court , arbitration , law , collective bargaining , economic justice , political science , majority opinion , sociology , law and economics
Last month's U.S. Supreme Court decision in 14 Penn Plaza LLC v. Pyett may signal a big change in the skills needed by labor arbitrators, according to Christopher Walsh, of Newark, N.J. He analyzes the case and tells readers what to expect as a result of Justice Clarence Thomas's majority opinion.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom