Premium
Stolt‐Nielsen's comfort for the ‘average arbitrator’: An analysis of the post‐ Hall Street ‘manifest disregard’ award review standard
Author(s) -
Walsh Christopher
Publication year - 2009
Publication title -
alternatives to the high cost of litigation
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 1549-4381
pISSN - 1549-4373
DOI - 10.1002/alt.20265
Subject(s) - arbitration , state (computer science) , law , political science , federal arbitration act , law and economics , sociology , computer science , algorithm , compulsory arbitration
Christopher Walsh , of Newark, N.J., looks at the current state of the longstanding use of manifest disregard as an addition to Federal Arbitration Act standards for challenging awards. He focuses on the recent Second Circuit case of Stolt‐Nielsen v. Animalfeeds.