z-logo
Premium
Court committtee opinion limiting ADR representation raises constitutional issues, as well as problems rooted in protectionism
Author(s) -
Lurie Paul M.
Publication year - 2007
Publication title -
alternatives to the high cost of litigation
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 1549-4381
pISSN - 1549-4373
DOI - 10.1002/alt.20175
Subject(s) - limiting , supreme court , law , representation (politics) , protectionism , political science , state (computer science) , majority opinion , law and economics , sociology , economics , computer science , international trade , algorithm , mechanical engineering , politics , engineering
More commentary on a January New Jersey Supreme Court committee's unauthorized practice of law opinion restricting ADR representation. Paul M. Lurie , of Chicago, writes that the committee's stance raises constitutional issues, and reviews analogous state regulations around the country

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here