Premium
Effects of double‐dose intranasal corticosteroid for allergic rhinitis: a systematic review and meta‐analysis
Author(s) -
Khattiyawittayakun Likhit,
Seresirikachorn Kachorn,
Chitsuthipakorn Wirach,
Kanjanawasee Dichapong,
Snidvongs Kornkiat
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
international forum of allergy and rhinology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.503
H-Index - 46
eISSN - 2042-6984
pISSN - 2042-6976
DOI - 10.1002/alr.22204
Subject(s) - medicine , nasal administration , meta analysis , adverse effect , confidence interval , corticosteroid , randomized controlled trial , strictly standardized mean difference , relative risk , nasal spray , gastroenterology , immunology
Background When a standard dose of intranasal corticosteroid (INCS) fails to control symptoms of allergic rhinitis (AR), a double dose of INCS is optional. This systematic review aimed to assess the effects of double‐dose INCS. Methods Literature searches were performed using MEDLINE and EMBASE. Randomized controlled trials that studied the effects of double‐dose INCS vs standard‐dose INCS for treating patients with AR were included. Data from the included studies were extracted and collected for meta‐analyses. The outcomes were nasal symptoms, ocular symptoms, and adverse events. Results Twelve studies (4166 patients) met the inclusion criteria. There were 5 pediatric studies (1868 patients), 5 adult studies (1414 patients), and 2 studies with mixed populations (884 patients). The meta‐analysis results in adult patients favored the effects of double‐dose INCS on: total nasal symptom score (standardized mean difference [SMD] −0.25; 95% confidence interval [CI], −0.41 to −0.08; 4 studies; 568 patients) and total ocular symptom score (SMD −0.27; 95% CI, −0.52 to −0.03; 1 study; 259 patients). The meta‐analysis results in pediatric patients did not show the difference between groups on total nasal symptom score (SMD −0.16; 95% CI, −0.40 to 0.07; 3 studies; 801 patients). The meta‐analysis of ocular symptom score in pediatric patients had insufficient data. There were no differences between groups on adverse events. Conclusion Double‐dose INCS showed better improvement in nasal and ocular symptoms in adult patients with AR when compared to the standard dose. These beneficial effects were not seen in the pediatric population. Adverse events between groups were not different.