Premium
Sublingual immunotherapy for pediatric allergic conjunctivitis: a meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials
Author(s) -
Yang Jie,
Zhang Li,
Zhao Zhixiang,
Liao Shiyu
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
international forum of allergy and rhinology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.503
H-Index - 46
eISSN - 2042-6984
pISSN - 2042-6976
DOI - 10.1002/alr.22149
Subject(s) - medicine , meta analysis , randomized controlled trial , slit , cochrane library , subgroup analysis , allergic conjunctivitis , confidence interval , sublingual immunotherapy , pediatrics , guideline , allergy , allergen , immunology , asthma , pathology , genetics , biology
Background Allergic conjunctivitis (AC) is a common chronic condition, especially in children. Ocular symptoms are often overlooked during treatment of allergic rhinoconjunctivitis (ARC). Pediatric ARC can be effectively treated using sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT), which is a guideline‐recommended safe treatment approach. However, the therapeutic efficacy of SLIT in terms of ameliorating eye symptoms has not been effectively evaluated. Methods We performed a meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the use of SLIT for infants, children, and adolescents (aged from 3 to 18 years) with AC or ARC. We searched the Cochrane Library database, EMBASE, and Medline from November 1990 to 2017 to find papers dealing with the effects of SLIT on pediatric AC or ARC. We used standardized mean differences (SMDs) to assess therapeutic effects, employing a random effects model. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses were also conducted. The I 2 metric was used to evaluate heterogeneity. Results In total, 13 clinical RCTs were included in our meta‐analysis. SLIT reduced ocular symptoms to a level below that of controls (SMD = −0.21; 95% confidence interval [CI], −0.41 to −0.01; p = 0.04; I 2 = 55%). Notably, on subgroup analysis, SLIT clearly reduced pollen‐induced pediatric AC (SMD = −0.36; 95% CI, −0.53 to −0.19; p < 0.0001; I 2 = 25%) but not mite‐induced AC (SMD = 0.20; 95% CI, −0.20 to 0.60; p = 0.34; I 2 = 46%). Conclusion SLIT relieved ocular symptoms in children with ARC or AC. To confirm these results, future meta‐analyses should evaluate high‐quality, large‐scale population‐based trials.