Premium
Reconsidering osteoarthritis as a skeletal indicator of age at death
Author(s) -
Winburn Allysha P.,
Stock Michala K.
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
american journal of physical anthropology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.146
H-Index - 119
eISSN - 1096-8644
pISSN - 0002-9483
DOI - 10.1002/ajpa.23914
Subject(s) - medicine , osteoarthritis , ankle , body mass index , demography , physical therapy , surgery , pathology , alternative medicine , sociology
Objectives Osteoarthritis (OA) generally increases with age, but it is a complex, multifactorial disease. This study investigated whether obesity, physical activity, and antemortem trauma preclude the use of OA for skeletal age estimation. Materials and Methods The temporomandibular joint (TMJ) and all appendicular joints were scored for skeletal indicators of OA in 408 modern European‐Americans (Bass Collection, TN). Binomial generalized linear models (GLMs) assessed the contributions of self‐reported demographic data to OA, including: age; body mass index (BMI); and metabolic values for physical activities. Repeated resampling tested whether observed mean OA scores for joints with trauma consistently exceeded mean scores for unaffected joints. Single‐variable GLM probit models were generated for OA presence/absence data in relevant joints. Results Age was the only statistically significant predictor of OA in most multivariable GLMs. Occupation and age were both significant predictors of male hand OA; BMI was the only significant predictor of female ankle OA. Trauma significantly affected OA in most joints. Age cut‐offs calculated from the single‐variable probit models (representing ages of transition to “OA present”) ranged from 29.7 to 77.3 years (90%) and 32.7 to 96.6 years (95%), but were problematic for the male TMJ. Discussion Ankle OA should not be used to age females; TMJ OA should not be used to age males. For other joints, using OA to inform age estimates appears valid (in absence of antemortem trauma). While skeletal evidence of OA is not a primary age indicator, its presence can refine age ranges and provide essential age data in fragmentary cases.