Premium
Age estimation of immature human skeletal remains from the dimensions of the girdle bones in the postnatal period
Author(s) -
Cardoso Hugo F. V.,
Spake Laure,
Humphrey Louise T.
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
american journal of physical anthropology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.146
H-Index - 119
eISSN - 1096-8644
pISSN - 0002-9483
DOI - 10.1002/ajpa.23248
Subject(s) - ischium , clavicle , shoulder girdle , pelvis , pelvic girdle , skeleton (computer programming) , age groups , forensic anthropology , estimation , human skeleton , medicine , demography , anatomy , geography , archaeology , management , sociology , economics
Objectives This study provides classical calibration regression formulae for age estimation from the dimensions of unfused shoulder and pelvic girdle bones. Materials and methods Age estimation models were derived from a sample of 160 known age and sex individuals (63 females and 97 males) aged birth to 12 years, selected from Portuguese and English skeletal collections. The sample was divided into two age groups at the age of 2 years, and formulae were obtained for the sexes separately and combined. Results Measurements of the pelvis provide more precise age estimates than the shoulder. In the younger age group, the height and width of the ilium, and the height of the glenoid yield the most precise age estimates. In the older age group, the length of the clavicle provides the most precise estimates, followed by measurements of the pubis and ischium. Discussion In the younger individuals (<2 years), age estimates based on measurements of the pelvic girdle seem to be as or more precise than those based on the length of long bones. In older individuals (≥2 years), estimates based on the measurements of the girdles are less precise than those based on the length of long bones. These age estimation formulae may be useful for fragmentary and incomplete material in archaeological and forensic contexts. The formulae are suitable for a variety of archeological populations living under adverse conditions. These conditions are similar to some “developing” countries, and hence the formulae may also be applicable to modern forensic remains from such environments.