z-logo
Premium
The ontogeny of nasal shape: An analysis of sexual dimorphism in a longitudinal sample
Author(s) -
Holton Nathan E.,
Alsamawi Ammar,
Yokley Todd R.,
Froehle Andrew W.
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
american journal of physical anthropology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.146
H-Index - 119
eISSN - 1096-8644
pISSN - 0002-9483
DOI - 10.1002/ajpa.22941
Subject(s) - sexual dimorphism , ontogeny , biology , craniofacial , sex characteristics , anatomy , zoology , endocrinology , genetics
Objectives Potential integration between the nasal region and noncranial components of the respiratory system has significant implications for understanding determinants of craniofacial variation. There is increasing evidence that sexual dimorphism in body size and associated male‐female differences in energetically relevant variables influence the development of the nasal region. To better understand this relationship, we examined the ontogeny of sexual dimorphism in nasal shape using a longitudinal series of lateral cephalograms. Methods We collected a series of two dimensional coordinate landmark data from n  = 20 males and n  = 18 females from 3.0 to 20.0+ years of age totaling n  = 290 observations across nine age groups. First, we tested whether there are sex differences in the nasal shape related to ontogenetic increases in body size (i.e., sitting height). Additionally, we examined whether there are male‐female differences in patterns of nonallometric variation in nasal shape. Next, we tested whether there are sex differences in the strength of integration between the nasal region and other aspects of the facial skeleton. Results Our results indicate that there are a number of similarities in patterns of morphological variation in the nasal region between males and females. However, as sitting height increases males exhibit a disproportionate increase in nasal region height that is not present in the female sample. Moreover, the male nasal region is less integrated with the surrounding facial skeleton when compared to the female sample. Conclusions These results are consistent with the hypothesis that sex differences in nasal development are associated with male‐female differences in energetically relevant variables. Am J Phys Anthropol 160:52–61, 2016. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here