z-logo
Premium
A combined morphometric analysis of foot form and its association with sex, stature, and body mass
Author(s) -
Domjanic Jacqueline,
Seidler Horst,
Mitteroecker Philipp
Publication year - 2015
Publication title -
american journal of physical anthropology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.146
H-Index - 119
eISSN - 1096-8644
pISSN - 0002-9483
DOI - 10.1002/ajpa.22752
Subject(s) - sexual dimorphism , footprint , foot (prosody) , morphometrics , orthodontics , biology , anatomy , medicine , zoology , paleontology , philosophy , linguistics
Objectives : Morphometric analysis of footprints is a classic means for orthopedic diagnosis. In forensics and physical anthropology, it is commonly used for the estimation of stature and body mass. We studied individual variation and sexual dimorphism of foot dimensions and footprint shape by a combination of classic foot measurements and geometric morphometric methods. Methods : Left and right feet of 134 healthy adult males and females were scanned twice with a 3D optical laser scanner, and stature as well as body mass were recorded. Foot length and width were measured on the 3D scans. The 2D footprints were extracted as the plantar‐most 2 mm of the 3D scans and measured with 85 landmarks and semilandmarks. Results : Both foot size and footprint shape are sexually dimorphic and relate to stature and body mass. While dimorphism in foot length largely results from dimorphism in stature, dimorphism in footprint shape partly owes to the dimorphism in BMI. Stature could be estimated well based on foot length ( R 2  = 0.76), whereas body mass was more closely related to foot width ( R 2  = 0.62). Sex could be estimated correctly for 95% of the individuals based on a combination of foot width and length. Discussion : Geometric morphometrics proved to be an effective tool for the detailed analysis of footprint shape. However, for the estimation of stature, body mass, and sex, shape variables did not considerably improve estimates based on foot length and width. Am J Phys Anthropol 157:582–591, 2015. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here