Premium
Brain endocast asymmetry in pongids and hominids: Some preliminary findings on the paleontology of cerebral dominance
Author(s) -
Holloway Ralph L.,
De La Costelareymondie Marie Christine
Publication year - 1982
Publication title -
american journal of physical anthropology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.146
H-Index - 119
eISSN - 1096-8644
pISSN - 0002-9483
DOI - 10.1002/ajpa.1330580111
Subject(s) - endocast , homo sapiens , australopithecus , homo erectus , encephalization , brain size , biology , evolutionary biology , gorilla , hominidae , paleoanthropology , paleontology , skull , zoology , biological evolution , geography , archaeology , pleistocene , medicine , genetics , radiology , magnetic resonance imaging
Observations on petalial asymmetry for 190 hominoid endocasts are reported, and their statistical differences assessed. While all taxa of hominoids show asymmetries to various degrees, the patterns or combinations of petalial asymmetries are very different, with fossil hominids and modern Homo sapiens showing an identical pattern of left‐occipital, right‐frontal petalias, which contrasts with those found normally in pongids. Of the pongids, Gorilla shows the greater degree of asymmetry in left‐occipital petalias. Only modern Homo and hominids ( Australopithecus, Homo erectus , Neandertals) show a distinct left‐occipital, right‐frontal petalial pattern. Analysis by x 2 statistics shows the differences to be highly significant. Due to small sample size and incompleteness of endocasts, small‐brained hominids, i.e., Australopithecus , are problematical. To the degree that gross petalial patterns are correlated with cognitive task specialization, we speculate that human cognitive patterns evolved early in hominid evolution and were related to selection pressures operating on both symbolic and spatiovisual integration, and that these faculties are corroborated in the archaeological record.