Premium
Skeletal growth in school children: Maturation and bone mass
Author(s) -
Mazess Richard B.,
Cameron John R.
Publication year - 1971
Publication title -
american journal of physical anthropology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.146
H-Index - 119
eISSN - 1096-8644
pISSN - 0002-9483
DOI - 10.1002/ajpa.1330350319
Subject(s) - bone age , radiography , bone mineral content , medicine , skeleton (computer programming) , bone mineral , body mass index , orthodontics , anatomy , surgery , osteoporosis
Skeletal growth and development was evaluated in 322 white children (age 6 to 14) using three different methods: (1) 125 I photon absorptiometry, (2) compact bone measures on radiographs, and (3) Greulich‐Pyle skeletal age from hand‐wrist radiographs. Bone mineral content, measured by photon absorptiometry, increased at an incremental rate of about 8.5% each year. Skeletal age was a poor predictor of skeletal status, i.e., bone mineral content (14% error), and did not decrease the predictive error substantially more than did chronological age. Gross morphology (height and weight) was in fact a better predictor of bone mineral content than were skeletal age, chronological age, and radiographic morphometry. Skeletal age deviations were correlated with deviations in body size. A bone mineral index was devised which was independent of body size and this index was also independent of skeletal age. Skeletal age is imprecise (3 to 6 months error) and the range of variation in normal children (13 months) overlaps the maturational delay of the malnourished and diseased. The difficulties in using skeletal maturation are discussed and it is suggested that particular maturational indices be used which better indicate skeletal growth than does a composite skeletal age.