Premium
Genetic substructure in South African Bantu‐speakers: Evidence from autosomal DNA and Y‐chromosome studies
Author(s) -
Lane A.B.,
Soodyall H.,
Arndt S.,
Ratshikhopha M.E.,
Jonker E.,
Freeman C.,
Young L.,
Morar B.,
Toffie L.
Publication year - 2002
Publication title -
american journal of physical anthropology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.146
H-Index - 119
eISSN - 1096-8644
pISSN - 0002-9483
DOI - 10.1002/ajpa.10097
Subject(s) - bantu languages , genetic distance , biology , population , gene flow , haplotype , genetics , xhosa , gene pool , genetic marker , chromosome , evolutionary biology , genetic variation , gene , linguistics , genetic diversity , demography , genotype , sociology , philosophy
The extent of genetic differentiation between seven South African Bantu‐speaking groups (Zulu, Xhosa, Tsonga/Shangaan, Southern Sotho, Pedi, Tswana, and Venda) was assessed from coancestry coefficients (F ST ) estimated from autosomal serogenetic, DNA, and Y‐chromosome DNA haplotypes. The overall F ST obtained from the autosomal data was 0.002, and that from the Y chromosome data was 0.014. The genetic relationships between groups examined were inferred from their cluster affinities in phylogenetic trees constructed from the genetic distances between them. Both autosomal and Y‐chromosome DNA studies reveal that 6 of the 7 South African Bantu‐speaking groups cluster according to their linguistic groupings, the exception being the Tsonga, who do not cluster with other Nguni language speakers, but rather with the Venda who live close to them. This suggests that the invading Shangaan‐speakers, whose Nguni language was adopted by the Tsonga, did not have a major effect on the Tsonga gene pool, and that gene flow from the Venda into the Tsonga may have been considerable. Genetic distances were found to correlate with geographic distances between the regions where each group's apparent population density is the highest. Linguistic distances were also found to correlate with genetic distances, but linguistic and geographic distances showed no correlation. Together, these results suggest that linguistic and some genetic differentiation took place before the groups (or their forerunners) reached their present‐day locations, and that further genetic change occurred after their arrival. Am J Phys Anthropol 119:175–185, 2002. © 2002 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.