Time matching between grooming partners: Do methodological distinctions between short versus long‐term reciprocation matter?

Abstract Primatologists have long focused on grooming exchanges to examine aspects of social relationships, co‐operation, and social cognition. One particular interest is the extent to which reciprocating grooming partners time match, and the time frame over which they do so. Conclusions about time matching vary across species. Generally, researchers focus on the duration of pauses between grooming episodes that involve a switch in partner roles and choose a cut‐off point to distinguish short from longer‐term reciprocation. Problematically, researchers have made inconsistent choices about cut‐offs. Such methodological variations are potentially concerning, as it is unclear whether inconsistent conclusions about short‐term time matching are attributable to species/ecological differences, or are due in part to methodological inconsistency. We ask whether various criteria for separating short versus long‐term reciprocation influence conclusions about short‐term time matching using data from free‐ranging rhesus ( Macaca mulatta ) and captive‐crested macaques ( Macaca nigra ). We compare several commonly used cut‐offs to ones generated by the currently preferred approach—survival analysis. Crested macaques displayed a mild degree of time matching regardless of the cutoff used. For rhesus macaques, whereas most cut‐offs yielded similar degrees of time matching as the one derived from survival analysis, very short ones significantly underestimated both the degree of time matching and the influence of rank distance on time matching. Although researchers may have some flexibility in their choice of cut‐offs, we suggest that they employ caution by using survival analysis when possible, and when not possible, by avoiding very short time windows.