z-logo
Premium
A dyadic genotype–phenotype approach to diagnostic criteria for Proteus syndrome
Author(s) -
Sapp Julie C.,
Buser Anna,
BurtonAkright Jasmine,
KepplerNoreuil Kim M.,
Biesecker Leslie G.
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
american journal of medical genetics part c: seminars in medical genetics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.419
H-Index - 101
eISSN - 1552-4876
pISSN - 1552-4868
DOI - 10.1002/ajmg.c.31744
Subject(s) - proteus syndrome , phenotype , omim : online mendelian inheritance in man , genetics , diagnostic test , akt1 , biology , gene , computational biology , medicine , bioinformatics , pediatrics , apoptosis , pi3k/akt/mtor pathway
Phenotype‐based diagnostic criteria were developed for Proteus syndrome in 1999 and updated in 2006. Subsequently, the causative mosaic gene alteration was discovered, the c.49G>A p.E17K variant in AKT1 . As well, a number of overlapping overgrowth disorders attributable to mosaic PIK3CA variants have now been characterized, leading to the designation of PIK3CA ‐related overgrowth spectrum (PROS). Finally, ongoing work to better characterize Proteus syndrome has led to identification of additional features of that disorder that could be useful in diagnostic criteria. We have taken the opportunity of these discoveries to re‐evaluate the Proteus syndrome diagnostic criteria. Here we propose a new set of diagnostic criteria that establishes a weighted, point‐based system for the phenotypic attributes and then integrates that with the potential molecular test results to result in one of two designations: AKT1 ‐related Proteus syndrome or AKT1 ‐related overgrowth spectrum. A patient whose only manifestation is an AKT1 c.49G>A‐positive tumor would receive neither of these designations. Here we review the rational basis of diagnostic criteria and argue that a unitary diagnostic entity is a distinct gene‐phenotype dyad and that this should be the model for all mendelian disorders. The gene‐alone or phenotype‐alone approach is inadequate to rigorously delineate a unitary diagnostic entity.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here