Premium
A novel heterozygous loss‐of‐function DCC Netrin 1 receptor variant in prenatal agenesis of corpus callosum and review of the literature
Author(s) -
SagiDain Lena,
Kurolap Alina,
Ilivitzki Anat,
Mory Adi,
Paperna Tamar,
Kedar Reuven,
GonzagaJauregui Claudia,
Peleg Amir,
Baris Feldman Hagit
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
american journal of medical genetics part a
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.064
H-Index - 112
eISSN - 1552-4833
pISSN - 1552-4825
DOI - 10.1002/ajmg.a.61404
Subject(s) - frameshift mutation , corpus callosum , exome sequencing , deleted in colorectal cancer , agenesis of the corpus callosum , penetrance , prenatal diagnosis , medicine , genetics , genetic counseling , loss function , holoprosencephaly , mutation , pregnancy , biology , pathology , gene , fetus , cancer , colorectal cancer , phenotype
Agenesis of the corpus callosum (ACC) is a common prenatally‐detected brain anomaly. Recently, an association between mutations in the DCC Netrin 1 receptor ( DCC ) gene and ACC, with or without mirror movements, has been demonstrated. In this manuscript, we present a family with a novel heterozygous frameshift mutation in DCC , review the available literature, and discuss the challenges involved in the genetic counseling for recently discovered disorders with paucity of medical information. We performed whole exome sequencing in a healthy nonconsanguineous couple that underwent two pregnancy terminations due to prenatal diagnosis of ACC. A heterozygous variant c.2774dupA (p.Asn925Lysfs*17) in the DCC gene was demonstrated in fetal and paternal DNA samples, as well as in a healthy 4‐year‐old offspring. When directly questioned, both father and child reported having mirror movements not affecting quality of life. Segregation analysis demonstrated the variant in three paternal siblings, two of them having mirror movements. Brain imaging revealed normal corpus callosum. Summary of literature data describing heterozygous loss‐of‐function variants in DCC ( n = 61) revealed 63.9% penetrance for mirror movements, 9.8% for ACC, and 5% for both. No significant neurodevelopmental abnormalities were reported among the seven published patients with DCC loss‐of‐function variants and ACC. Prenatal diagnosis of ACC should prompt a specific anamnesis regarding any neurological disorder, as well as intentional physical examination of both parents aimed to detect mirror movements. In suspicious cases, detection of DCC pathogenic variants might markedly improve the predicted prognosis, alleviate the parental anxiety, and possibly prevent pregnancy termination.