z-logo
Premium
Expanding the phenotype in Adams–Oliver syndrome correlating with the genotype
Author(s) -
Dudoig Benjamin,
Huber Celine,
Michot Caroline,
Di Rocco Federico,
Girard Muriel,
Lyonnet Stanislas,
Rio Marlène,
Rabia Smail Hadj,
Daire Valérie Cormier,
Baujat Geneviève
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
american journal of medical genetics part a
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.064
H-Index - 112
eISSN - 1552-4833
pISSN - 1552-4825
DOI - 10.1002/ajmg.a.61364
Subject(s) - genotype , aplasia cutis congenita , medicine , phenotype , exome sequencing , genotype phenotype distinction , pathology , dermatology , genetics , biology , gene , scalp
Rationale Adams–Oliver syndrome (AOS) is a genetic disorder characterized by the association of aplasia cutis congenita (ACC), terminal transverse limb defect (TTLD), congenital cardiac malformation (CCM), and minor features, such as cutaneous, neurological, and hepatic abnormalities (HAs). The aim of the study is to emphasize phenotype–genotype correlations in AOS. Methods We studied 29 AOS patients. We recorded retrospectively detailed phenotype data, including clinical examination, biological analyses, and imaging. The molecular analysis was performed through whole exome sequencing (WES). Results Twenty‐nine patients (100%) presented with ACC, the principal inclusion criteria in the study. Seventeen of twenty‐one (81%) had cutis marmorata telangiectasia congenita, 16/26 (62%) had TTLD, 14/23 (61%) had CCM, 7/20 (35%) had HAs, and 9/27 (33%) had neurological findings. WES was performed in 25 patients. Fourteen of twenty‐five (56%) had alterations in the genes already described in AOS. CCM and HAs are particularly associated with the NOTCH1 genotype. TTLD is present in patients with DOCK6 and EOGT alterations. Neurological findings of variable degree were associated sometimes with DOCK6 and NOTCH1 rarely with EOGT . Conclusion AOS is characterized by a clinical and molecular variability. It appears that degrees of genotype–phenotype correlations exist for patients with identified pathogenic mutations, underlining the need to undertake a systematic but adjusted multidisciplinary assessment.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here