Premium
Utility of genetic evaluation in infants with congenital heart defects admitted to the cardiac intensive care unit
Author(s) -
AhrensNicklas Rebecca C.,
Khan Shama,
Garbarini Jennifer,
Woyciechowski Stacy,
D'Alessandro Lisa,
Zackai Elaine H.,
Deardorff Matthew A.,
Goldmuntz Elizabeth
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
american journal of medical genetics part a
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.064
H-Index - 112
eISSN - 1552-4833
pISSN - 1552-4825
DOI - 10.1002/ajmg.a.37891
Subject(s) - medicine , genetic testing , medical genetics , exome sequencing , etiology , population , pediatrics , neonatal intensive care unit , bioinformatics , genetics , pathology , biology , mutation , environmental health , gene
Congenital heart defects (CHDs) are heterogeneous and present with a spectrum of severity, with roughly 25% of patients requiring intervention before age 1. The etiology of disease is unknown in many individuals; however, there is a rapidly expanding understanding of genetic risk factors that may contribute to pathogenesis. Through this work, we sought to evaluate the diagnostic yield of a clinical genetics evaluation and associated genetic testing among infants with critical CHDs. Furthermore, we aimed to both determine the utility of microarray and establish a strong baseline that can be used in future studies of the impact of exome sequencing in this population. We completed a retrospective chart review of 364 infants with CHDs admitted to the Cardiac Intensive Care Unit who underwent a clinical genetics evaluation. A genetic diagnosis was established in 25% of patients: 9% of infants were diagnosed prenatally, while 16% were diagnosed postnatally. Cardiac lesion subtype greatly influenced the diagnostic yield. On physical exam, the presence of dysmorphic features, as assessed by a clinical geneticist, was associated with a sevenfold increased likelihood of reaching a diagnosis. Directed by clinical acumen, diagnostic rates varied by testing modality with rates of 23% for karyotype, 12% for fluorescent in situ hybridization or multiplex‐dependent ligation probe analysis, 9% for genome wide microarray, and 17% for targeted gene sequencing. Careful consideration of lesion subtype and physical exam findings clarify populations of infants with CHD that benefit from a genetics evaluation and inform an efficient testing paradigm. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom