Premium
Congenital limb deficiency classification and nomenclature: The need for a consensus
Author(s) -
Lowry Robert Brian,
Bedard Tanya
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
american journal of medical genetics part a
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.064
H-Index - 112
eISSN - 1552-4833
pISSN - 1552-4825
DOI - 10.1002/ajmg.a.37608
Subject(s) - terminology , nomenclature , etiology , consensus conference , medicine , intensive care medicine , epidemiology , variety (cybernetics) , pediatrics , computer science , pathology , biology , artificial intelligence , taxonomy (biology) , philosophy , linguistics , botany
After the thalidomide epidemic in the early 1960s, many jurisdictions developed congenital anomaly surveillance systems. Congenital limb deficiencies can act as indicators of potential teratogens. The classification of congenital limb deficiencies is essential to determine the precise cause or causes of this anomaly. This article describes the different terminology and classification that have been used over time and the need for a consensus. While there are a variety of studies examining the epidemiology and etiology of congenital limb deficiencies, there is an inconsistent use of terminology and classification which makes comparisons between studies challenging. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.