z-logo
Premium
Search for a gene responsible for Floating‐Harbor syndrome on chromosome 12q15q21.1
Author(s) -
Lopez Estelle,
Callier Patrick,
CormierDaire Valérie,
Lacombe Didier,
Moncla Anne,
Bottani Armand,
Lambert Sandy,
Goldenberg Alice,
Doray Bérénice,
Odent Sylvie,
Sanlaville Damien,
Gueneau Lucie,
Duplomb Laurence,
Huet Frédéric,
Aral Bernard,
ThauvinRobinet Christel,
Faivre Laurence
Publication year - 2012
Publication title -
american journal of medical genetics part a
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.064
H-Index - 112
eISSN - 1552-4833
pISSN - 1552-4825
DOI - 10.1002/ajmg.a.34401
Subject(s) - phenocopy , haploinsufficiency , genetics , short stature , gene , candidate gene , mutation , chromosome , index case , biology , disease , intellectual disability , medicine , phenotype , pediatrics , pathology
Floating‐Harbor syndrome (FHS) is characterized by characteristic facial dysmorphism, short stature with delayed bone age, and expressive language delay. To date, the gene(s) responsible for FHS is (are) unknown and the diagnosis is only made on the basis of the clinical phenotype. The majority of cases appeared to be sporadic but rare cases following autosomal dominant inheritance have been reported. We identified a 4.7 Mb de novo 12q15‐q21.1 microdeletion in a patient with FHS and intellectual deficiency. Pangenomic 244K array‐CGH performed in a series of 12 patients with FHS failed to identify overlapping deletions. We hypothesized that FHS is caused by haploinsufficiency of one of the 19 genes or predictions located in the deletion found in our index patient. Since none of them appeared to be good candidate gene by their function, a high‐throughput sequencing approach of the region of interest was used in eight FHS patients. No pathogenic mutation was found in these patients. This approach failed to identify the gene responsible for FHS, and this can be explained by at least four reasons: (i) our index patient could be a phenocopy of FHS; (ii) the disease may be clinically heterogeneous (since the diagnosis relies exclusively on clinical features), (iii) these could be genetic heterogeneity of the disease, (iv) the patient could carry a mutation in a gene located elsewhere. Recent descriptions of patients with 12q15‐q21.1 microdeletions argue in favor of the phenocopy hypothesis. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here