z-logo
Premium
A complex 6p25 rearrangement in a child with multiple epiphyseal dysplasia
Author(s) -
Bedoyan Jirair K.,
Lesperance Marci M.,
Ackley Todd,
Iyer Ramaswamy K.,
Innis Jeffrey W.,
Misra Vinod K.
Publication year - 2011
Publication title -
american journal of medical genetics part a
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.064
H-Index - 112
eISSN - 1552-4833
pISSN - 1552-4825
DOI - 10.1002/ajmg.a.33751
Subject(s) - biology , genetics , comparative genomic hybridization , gene duplication , gene rearrangement , snp array , genomic dna , gene , copy number variation , single nucleotide polymorphism , genome , genotype
Genomic rearrangements are increasingly recognized as important contributors to human disease. Here we report on an 11½‐year‐old child with myopia, Duane retraction syndrome, bilateral mixed hearing loss, skeletal anomalies including multiple epiphyseal dysplasia, and global developmental delay, and a complex 6p25 genomic rearrangement. We have employed oligonucleotide‐based comparative genomic hybridization arrays (aCGH) of different resolutions (44 and 244K) as well as a 1 M single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) array to analyze this complex rearrangement. Our analyses reveal a complex rearrangement involving a ∼2.21 Mb interstitial deletion, a ∼240 kb terminal deletion, and a 70–80 kb region in between these two deletions that shows maintenance of genomic copy number. The interstitial deletion contains eight known genes, including three Forkhead box containing (FOX) transcription factors ( FOXQ1 , FOXF2 , and FOXC1 ). The region maintaining genomic copy number partly overlaps the dual specificity protein phosphatase 22 ( DUSP22 ) gene. Array analyses suggest a homozygous loss of genomic material at the 5′ end of DUSP22 , which was corroborated using TaqMan® copy number analysis. It is possible that this homozygous genomic loss may render both copies of DUSP22 or its products non‐functional. Our analysis suggests a rearrangement mechanism distinct from a previously reported replication‐based error‐prone mechanism without template switching for a specific 6p25 rearrangement with a 1.22 Mb interstitial deletion. Our study demonstrates the utility and limitations of using oligonucleotide‐based aCGH and SNP array technologies of increasing resolutions in order to identify complex DNA rearrangements and gene disruptions. © 2010 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom